John Passant

Site menu:

 

October 2010
M T W T F S S
« Sep   Nov »
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Tags

Archives

Authors

Site search

Miniposts

Canberra: Left Unity Public Forum
Left Unity: A Forum with Socialist Alternative and Socialist Alliance on Left Unity 6 pm Thursday 16 May Room G 52 Haydon-Allen Building ANU Socialist Alternative and Socialist Alliance are in talks about unity, and as part of that process we will hold a joint forum here in Canberra on left unity in Australia. If you are interested in this exciting development and want to learn more or be involved, come along to this public forum and hear the discussion and debate. https://www.facebook.com/events/452603648150763/ (0)

Labor's super back down: a party rotten to the core
Me on superannuation and the death rattle of the ALP in The  Conversation. (0)

Marxism 2013 Conference
“Marxism is one of the best forums for debate in Australia” John Pilger gives a glowing review of the Marxism Conference. He will be returning to speak at Marxism 2013. Buy your tickets online today at www.marxismconference.org The talk on Saturday at 4 pm about taxing the rich looks interesting too.  Wonder who is giving that one? (0)

Marx and taxing economic rent in Australia
A very amateurish first draft by me on Marx and taxing economic rent, with too much explanation of basic ideas and then off on tangents and misunderstood ideas. http://docs.business.auckland.ac.nz/Doc/51-John-Passant.pdf

(0)

An article of mine on superannuation tax rorts in the Canberra Times
This is an article of mine in the Canberra Times on Tuesday 12 February. I argue that the benefits of the superannuation tax concessions go disproportionately and overwhelmingly to the rich and that it’s time to end the super tax rorts. (3)

Me in the media recently on tax
‘Mining Tax shortfall: the experts respond’ The Conversation 8 February 2013 ‘Current super concessions favour the wealthy – so why aren’t we supporting reform?” The Conversation 8 February 2013 (0)

Tax the rich
I am speaking at Marxism 2013 on taxing the rich. I will be talking on Sunday 31 March at 11.30. The Conference is the biggest left wing event of the year, over Easter at Melbourne University. Others speakers among the 70 or more include John Pilger, Gary Foley, Billy X Jennings, Brian Jones, Bob Carnegie, Jeff Sparrow, Antony Loewenstein, Toufic Haddad, and speakers from parties from Indonesia, The Philippines, Pakistan, New Zealand, the US and many many more….Check out the link here. (2)

The 99 Passant
I am about half through compiling the first volume of my most read (readers’ view) or most interesting (my view) articles from this blog.  Keep an eye out for Volume I of the 99 Passant when it is published later this year. I’ll keep you updated. (0)

More threats
As some of you may know I have been censoring the posts of a serial pest who makes anti-Muslim and racist comments and has in the past threatened me. He has posted again saying that the next time he is in my area – he names my street – he’ll ‘drop in to say g’day’. Clearly this is an attempt to further intimidate me. If anything happens to me or my family here are his details to provide to police.  jack 58.96.105.106  He has a druid name email at txc. (0)

Doctors and other bruises
I am having various tests and analysis done with a range of doctors over the coming weeks so may not be as communicative as normal on this blog. Bear with me. Hopefully I will be back in the New Year fighting fit. (4)

Advertisement

Links:

Why does reformism remain so powerful?

The election of Ed Miliband as Labour leader has renewed a number of people’s belief that the party can be a vehicle for changing society.

Thousands of people have joined or rejoined the party since its electoral defeat in May to oppose the Tory government.

While its betrayals in government drove many members and voters to abandon the party, millions of working class people still support it—and others are returning to it.

So why does the Labour Party retain such huge support, despite always letting down its voters?

The vast majority of workers are reformist. They think that capitalism can be gradually altered to better meet their needs and they don’t believe that the system needs to be overthrown.

People aren’t reformist because they are stupid. Reformism is the common sense of capitalism. We are brought up to believe that capitalism is natural and the best way to organise society.

All of the key institutions—the family, the mass media and the education system—promote this idea. As Karl Marx said, “The ideas of the ruling class are in every epoch the ruling ideas.”

The dominant ideas in our society reflect the ideas of those at the top, who ridicule anyone who argues that society can be run in a different way.

Our rulers also promote the idea that politics and economics are separate. This means that, while workers may think they can strike for “economic” things like their pension or a pay rise, they see “politics” as best left to elected representatives.

Alien

This ideology is important in bolstering reformist ideas. But there is a more fundamental reason why workers adopt them.

Marx pointed out that material reality shapes ideas. Workers have immense potential power—they make up the biggest class in society and all of production relies upon them.

But we don’t usually feel very powerful. Partly this is because of an ideology that grinds into us the idea that we must rely on others to run things and that we must know our place in society.

It’s also because, despite being the key to production, workers have no say over it. We go to work for someone else—and they decide what we will produce, how we’ll do it, how much we’ll produce and what will happen to it afterwards.

This leads to what Marx referred to as “alienation”, where the world appears not as something that we have shaped but as something alien, with a life of its own.

This feeling of powerlessness means that workers, for most of the time, don’t think that they could play an active role in transforming, or running, society. And this lack of confidence in their own ability means they look to parties such as Labour to change things for them.

But there are counterweights to reformism. Capitalism is full of contradictions that can weaken reformist ideas. The idea that the system works in all our interests can ring hollow when thousands are thrown out of work as the rich get richer.

Ideas are shaped by the concrete circumstances people find themselves in. Capitalism makes workers feel powerless but the drive for profit means bosses are constantly pushed to attack—and this pushes workers to fight back collectively.

And when they do this, their ideas change.

One week, Susan may believe that she doesn’t have very much power and that important decisions have to be left to “experts”. But if the next week she has to occupy her factory to keep it open, she will probably think very differently.

She will be doing things she had never previously thought possible, changing how she sees other workers and herself. She will begin to see the power of workers to run society without bosses.

Of course, struggle doesn’t instantly and automatically transform workers into revolutionaries.

Reformist ideas don’t simply disappear when huge struggles erupt. They are strong and deep-rooted. And workers can hold contradictory ideas in their heads, accepting some aspects of revolutionary politics while still holding some reformist ideas.

That’s why revolutionary parties matter. Socialists will need to work alongside Labour Party members and others in the coming struggles to defeat the Tories’ attacks

Revolutionary socialists should always fight for the idea that workers have the power to build society anew.

But a majority will only really be won to this idea when they are in the process of doing it.

It will take a revolution to bury reformist ideas for good.

This article first appeared in Socialist Worker UK online.

Advertisement

Comments

Comment from Auntie Rhoberta
Time October 13, 2010 at 8:25 pm

I think that fear of savage reprisals from capital — which of course can include foreign blockade and invasion — might be a factor too. And also a fear that self-management ‘doesn’t work’, not due to workers’ incompetence but for ‘logistical’ reasons (‘too many meetings’ etc).