John Passant

Site menu:

 

February 2013
M T W T F S S
« Jan   Mar »
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728  

Tags

Archives

Authors

Site search

Miniposts

Canberra: Left Unity Public Forum
Left Unity: A Forum with Socialist Alternative and Socialist Alliance on Left Unity 6 pm Thursday 16 May Room G 52 Haydon-Allen Building ANU Socialist Alternative and Socialist Alliance are in talks about unity, and as part of that process we will hold a joint forum here in Canberra on left unity in Australia. If you are interested in this exciting development and want to learn more or be involved, come along to this public forum and hear the discussion and debate. https://www.facebook.com/events/452603648150763/ (0)

Labor's super back down: a party rotten to the core
Me on superannuation and the death rattle of the ALP in The  Conversation. (0)

Marxism 2013 Conference
“Marxism is one of the best forums for debate in Australia” John Pilger gives a glowing review of the Marxism Conference. He will be returning to speak at Marxism 2013. Buy your tickets online today at www.marxismconference.org The talk on Saturday at 4 pm about taxing the rich looks interesting too.  Wonder who is giving that one? (0)

Marx and taxing economic rent in Australia
A very amateurish first draft by me on Marx and taxing economic rent, with too much explanation of basic ideas and then off on tangents and misunderstood ideas. http://docs.business.auckland.ac.nz/Doc/51-John-Passant.pdf

(0)

An article of mine on superannuation tax rorts in the Canberra Times
This is an article of mine in the Canberra Times on Tuesday 12 February. I argue that the benefits of the superannuation tax concessions go disproportionately and overwhelmingly to the rich and that it’s time to end the super tax rorts. (3)

Me in the media recently on tax
‘Mining Tax shortfall: the experts respond’ The Conversation 8 February 2013 ‘Current super concessions favour the wealthy – so why aren’t we supporting reform?” The Conversation 8 February 2013 (0)

Tax the rich
I am speaking at Marxism 2013 on taxing the rich. I will be talking on Sunday 31 March at 11.30. The Conference is the biggest left wing event of the year, over Easter at Melbourne University. Others speakers among the 70 or more include John Pilger, Gary Foley, Billy X Jennings, Brian Jones, Bob Carnegie, Jeff Sparrow, Antony Loewenstein, Toufic Haddad, and speakers from parties from Indonesia, The Philippines, Pakistan, New Zealand, the US and many many more….Check out the link here. (2)

The 99 Passant
I am about half through compiling the first volume of my most read (readers’ view) or most interesting (my view) articles from this blog.  Keep an eye out for Volume I of the 99 Passant when it is published later this year. I’ll keep you updated. (0)

More threats
As some of you may know I have been censoring the posts of a serial pest who makes anti-Muslim and racist comments and has in the past threatened me. He has posted again saying that the next time he is in my area – he names my street – he’ll ‘drop in to say g’day’. Clearly this is an attempt to further intimidate me. If anything happens to me or my family here are his details to provide to police.  jack 58.96.105.106  He has a druid name email at txc. (0)

Doctors and other bruises
I am having various tests and analysis done with a range of doctors over the coming weeks so may not be as communicative as normal on this blog. Bear with me. Hopefully I will be back in the New Year fighting fit. (4)

Advertisement

Links:

The resistable rise of Adolf Hitler

Hitler’s rise to power was the greatest defeat in the history of the working class, and we are told all kinds of myths about how it happened. Donny Gluckstein in Socialist Worker UK uncovers the real story—and looks at how we can stop it happening again

Eighty years ago this week, on 30 January 1933, Hitler became chancellor of Germany. This infamous day has been dubbed “midnight in the century”. It opened a new period of terror unlike anything the world had ever seen—bringing repression, war and the industrial murder of more than ten million people.

TV pundits and school textbooks tell us that “the initiator and motive force of everything that happened was Adolf Hitler”. He is described as a uniquely charismatic leader whose mesmerising eyes and rhetoric captivated everyone.

Others cast almost the whole population of Germany as Hitler’s “willing executioners”.

But easy answers avoid the horrifying truth of the Nazis’ path to power—that it could have happened almost anywhere, and that it could still come back.

Today fascist groups are trying to rebuild across Europe. It is important to look behind the myths to understand what really happened on that terrible day—to ensure it never happens again.



MYTH 1: Hitler hypnotised his followers

The bile and lies pumped out by the Nazi party (NSDAP) under Goebbels’ direction barely changed from its foundation in 1920. It blamed Communists, foreigners and especially Jews for the woes of the “master race”.

But as late as 1928 it received the smallest vote of the seven main parties, at just 2.6 percent. Two years later, after the Wall Street Crash, it became the second largest party.

Analysis of the election results reveals its vote grew the most in rural areas. This was away from the rallies and where the Nazi propaganda machine was least visible.

So the Nazi vote was, above all, a middle class protest against the impact of the Crash. As one historian wrote, “It was not that the NSDAP won over their voters, but rather that the voters sought out their party.’

This has been the pattern for all successful fascist movements. They provide a response to the crisis for the worst elements of the middle classes.

These are social layers who have neither the wealth of the bosses nor the collective solidarity of the working class. Hitler gave them a substitute for economic power.



MYTH 2: All Germans backed Hitler

Hitler sought support from all sides. This is evident in his party’s full name—the National Socialist German Workers’ Party. “National” and “German” appealed to the right wing, the middle and upper classes.

But “Socialist” and “Worker” were designed to attract the left and the working class.

Hitler succeeded in hoovering up almost all middle class votes but he failed with the workers.

The working class made up over half of the German population, but less than a third of those who joined the NSDAP were working class.

The elite were over-represented in the party—four times compared to their share of the population.

The middle class made up a third more of the party than they did the population. Women too were resistant, forming just 5 percent of the total.

The Nazi “trade union” attracted just 170,000 members while the socialist federation had four million.



MYTH 3: Hitler was elected

Books tell us that Hitler headed “the most powerful political party Germany had ever seen”.

But even when the sudden economic crisis temporarily threw millions of votes into the Nazi camp, this was well short of a majority.

At its peak in July 1932 it had 37 percent of votes—less than the combined vote of the left parties.

And in every previous general election since 1890 it was the left wing Social Democrats who achieved the largest share.

After the NSDAP’s success in July 1932, Hitler demanded the chancellorship from German president, field marshal Hindenburg.

Hindenburg’s reply was contemptuous. “At most I will make him my Postmaster General,” he said, “and he can lick me on the stamps from behind!” Hitler’s electoral bid for power had failed.

By the time he was made chancellor, the NSDAP was in crisis and its electoral support was crumblings.

In December 1932 Goebbels wrote in his diary, “The future looks dark and gloomy; all prospects and hopes have quite disappeared”.



How Germany’s ruling class helped Hitler into power

So how did Hitler become chancellor? The story starts with a revolution that swept Germany in November 1918. Mutinous sailors joined workers and soldiers to overthrow the Kaiser and end the bloody First World War.

The establishment’s dream of an empire to rival Britain and France was thwarted.

It hated the revolution and barely tolerated the Weimar Republic that followed.

But it was too weak to recover control. So it funded a variety of paramilitary right wing groupings to attack the left.

By the mid-1920s the immediate threats of revolution had passed and Germany’s economy boomed.

That all came to a juddering halt with the crash of 1929, which drove up unemployment.

President Hindenburg was determined to make workers pay for this crisis. In 1930 he suspended democracy and ruled by decree.

Ordinary people had a stark choice to make.

Should they fight the system that had produced vast misery, or should they blame scapegoats, such as Jews and Communists?

The Nazis fed on economic crisis.

They attracted large numbers of enraged middle class people.

Hitler wasn’t voted into power, but he became a major political player as a result of the crash.

Hindenburg could barely keep control. He could only partially maintain order by playing Hitler’s mass support against workers—particularly the rising power of the Communists.

The aristocratic president still regarded the Fuhrer as a low class rabble-rouser.

But when it seemed the Nazi party was collapsing, he made Hitler chancellor of Germany.

Stories of a valiant seizure of power are nonsense.

Hitler was appointed.

He would outwit the clique who selected him, yet he remained a loyal if wayward servant of the German ruling class.



United left could have won

Germany’s workers, united and properly led, could have brought a different outcome.

Most workers saw through the Nazi lies and voted socialist or Communist. Millions belonged to unions. Despite unemployment every factory, railway, and power plant depended on workers to function.

But this force was never used, because the left was fatally divided.

The most determined anti-fascists were in the Communist Party that had been set up after the Russian Revolution. But when Joseph Stalin’s bureaucracy took over in Russia it destroyed the gains of the revolution and promoted the worst possible leadership to the Communist parties in other countries.

The Communists in Germany attacked the socialist SPD as “social fascists” and “1,000 times worse than an open fascist dictatorship”.

Communists had legitimate grievances against the SPD for killing their leaders and holding back revolution. But faced with the Nazi menace a united, active opposition was essential.

Mass demonstrations, strikes and physical confrontation with Nazi thugs could have made a real difference.

Alas, nothing was done.

Austria, Spain, France and Second World War resistance movements later showed how to fight fascism. Success was never guaranteed in advance, but at least there was not the passive immobility of January 1933.

This produced what the exiled Russian revolutionary Leon Trotsky called “undoubtedly the greatest defeat of the working class in history”.



The opposition in Germany

After 1933 even the smallest acts of opposition required enormous courage. The Nazis led a regime of absolute terror.

The left parties, unions and other independent organisations were smashed—even the boy scouts.

Yet resistance continued. Underground Jewish organisations developed in every ghetto and camp.

The uprising in the Warsaw Ghetto in 1943 was matched by sabotage and breakouts in death camps including Sobibor, Treblinka and Auschwitz.

Membership of Hitler’s youth organisations was compulsory, but many young people fought back. Their opposition ranged from playing illegal jazz music, to armed combat.

There were innumerable working class groups with exotic names like OK gangs, Charlie gangs, Snake Club and Blue Miasma. The most popular name was Pirates.

Led by the 23 year old son of a Communist, in 1944 Cologne’s Edelweiss Pirates blew up bridges, derailed trains and killed the local Gestapo chief.

But the most important resistance came from the working class. Though limited by repression there were strikes, go slows and acts of sabotage.

The Social Democrats’ main effort was to spread illegal literature, such as their Socialist Action bulletin.

The Communists also fought back with the utmost bravery.

Gestapo agents admitted that, “Convinced Communists again and again sacrifice their lives to avoid having to betray their comrades.” Many smaller parties and groups fought back, but were smashed.

Harsh experience helped heal rifts in the workers’ movement, but it came too late. The bitter lesson of 1933 was that Hitler had to be stopped before he had power.

Advertisement

Comments

Comment from Kay
Time February 1, 2013 at 8:23 am

Sounds like an indictment of the ability of the socialist/communist organisations to engender support amongst the population to counter Hitler’s rise to power. I suspect that the supposed ‘solidarity’ of the ‘workers’ had become less than the left wing organisations had assumed, despite the previous good electoral support.

My late parents-in-law were workers in Germany at the time of Hitler’s rise. They were attracted to Hitler’s nationalistic fervour, especially after the humiliation of WW1. I think this article mistakenly suggests that the Nazi supporters were all members of the ‘middle class’ or were the more wealthy ‘bosses’. My understanding from them was that Hitler was widely supported by the poorer working class, and was more criticised by the Jews, academics, & more liberal-minded middle class citizens. They told me that they saw this criticism more as concern by the better-off that their position of privilege might be challenged. But of course, the temptation to rewrite history is all-pervasive! Everyone does it!

But I do agree that this scenario can easily happen again if we are not vigilant about protecting freedom of speech and action. But I fear both the Left and the Right – both can seize power and rule in a harsh, undemocratic, dictatorial manner – as happened in Germany (the Nazis) and in the former Communist countries (USSR & the Eastern Bloc). Both the Left and the Right have poor track records. May god protect me from extremists of all kinds!!

Comment from Chek
Time February 1, 2013 at 9:34 am

Thanks John.

For the missing link in all the docos I have seen about Hitler – his appointment!

Hope you are fighting fit.

chek

Comment from John
Time February 1, 2013 at 3:25 pm

Dear oh dear. You parents in law or the facts and figures. yes, far better we have responsible middle of the roads like Bush and Obama whose record on killing innocent people – 1 million in Iraq, tens of thousands in Afghanistan etc – are shining examples of moderation. As I guess is the 2 mellon the US regime killed in Vietnam. Good old middle of the roads, they are so nice. And let me make a suggestion. Stalinism is not of the left – neither Stalin, nor Mao nor Fidel were or are socialists.

Comment from Kay
Time February 1, 2013 at 4:09 pm

Well, Stalin, Mao and Fidel all called themselves Communists – and labelled their governments as Communist. And they all worshiped Marx. In practice, they all oppressed their citizens in totalitarian regimes. Not Socialist? no, Socialist regimes have never existed – just a figment of hope for some.

I guess those who actually lived in Germany at the time of Hitler’s rise and suffered through the war on the losing side couldn’t possibly have a clue as to what really happened. But some unknown UK socialist has got it all worked out! Give me a break!

Iraq, Afghanistan – the opposing Muslim groups within those countries are doing a pretty good job of killing their fellow citizens – as Islam extremists are doing in many countries (Mali, for example). US intervention around the world has certainly resulted in death and destruction. But dishing out death and destruction seems to be pretty rife everywhere, whether the US is involved or not.

I believe that if ever some Socialist government came to be, it would look pretty much like Nazi Germany or the USSR in practice. Some are always more equal than others!

Comment from Denis L White
Time February 1, 2013 at 7:58 pm

John have you ever noticed that most of the worms that crawl out of the woodwork have not the least idea which part of themselves is “left” or which part is “right” so consequently and sadly they also have not the least idea which way to turn.
Keep up your good work.
Den 71

Comment from Ross
Time February 1, 2013 at 9:12 pm

Hitler rose to power because of the WW1 war reparations that the British and the rest of the European Oligarchs imposed on Germany.Germany was driven into poverty and this enabled the rise of fascism in Germany.The ordinary Jews were an easy target since they had close associations with the financial system which oppressed Germans.

Comment from Kay
Time February 2, 2013 at 6:48 am

Denis

Can’t you express your ideas without denigrating others? Is it perhaps because you have nothing intelligent to add to the discussion?

Sadly it is common for people to turn to abuse when they cannot debate intelligently. Denigrating other people says a lot about you – and you should be embarrassed.

Comment from John
Time February 2, 2013 at 8:03 am

Grow up Kay. Discuss the issues not the trolling attacks you make.

Comment from John
Time February 2, 2013 at 8:06 am

The financial system doesn’t control us. That is reactionary and dangerously so nonsense. Ordinary Jews did not have close association with the finance system. And maybe, just maybe, the Great Depression had something to do with the rise of Hitler and his ideas about smashing unions and driving down living standards to restore profit rates (which fell because of an increase in capital investment compared to that in human labour) might have made him acceptable to important sections of capital.

Comment from Kay
Time February 2, 2013 at 9:58 am

John

I have never made a trolling attack – but your admirers have! I do get sick of them. They are full of trolling insults – but they support you – so, no problem! I always discuss substance – and you know that quite well. But when you get sick of arguing with me, you too throw in some ‘shit’ hoping I’ll go limping off! An obvious and common tactic!

Yes, the Depression had a big part to play in the rise of Hitler – and the inflation. The Jews were very well educated, smart and generally prosperous – a good reason for envy. But Hitler made Germans feel they would be better off with him running things – including most workers – he promised big, and promised to restore national pride – a big issue in Germany. It was mainly the Jews, intellectuals and the Left Wing organisations who realised the danger – but they were powerless against the regime of terror.