ga('send', 'pageview');
John Passant

Site menu:

November 2016
M T W T F S S
« Oct   Dec »
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930  

Tags

Archives

RSS Oz House

Share

Authors

Subscribe to us

Get new blog posts delivered to your inbox.


RSS Blog RSS

Site search

Miniposts

Keep socialist blog En Passant going - donate now
If you want to keep a blog that makes the arguments every day against the ravages of capitalism going and keeps alive the flame of democracy and community, make a donation to help cover my costs. And of course keep reading the blog. To donate click here. Keep socialist blog En Passant going. More... (4)

Sprouting sh*t for almost nothing
You can prove my 2 ex-comrades wrong by donating to my blog En Passant at BSB: 062914 Account: 1067 5257, the Commonwealth Bank in Tuggeranong, ACT. More... (12)

My interview Razor Sharp 18 February
Me interviewed by Sharon Firebrace on Razor Sharp on Tuesday 18 February. http://sharonfirebrace.files.wordpress.com/2014/02/18-2-14-john-passant-aust-national-university-g20-meeting-age-of-enttilement-engineers-attack-of-austerity-hardship-on-civilians.mp3 (0)

My interview Razor Sharp 11 February 2014
Me interviewed by Sharon Firebrace on Razor Sharp this morning. The Royal Commission, car industry and age of entitlement get a lot of the coverage. http://sharonfirebrace.com/2014/02/11/john-passant-aust-national-university-canberra-2/ (0)

Razor Sharp 4 February 2014
Me on 4 February 2014 on Razor Sharp with Sharon Firebrace. http://sharonfirebrace.files.wordpress.com/2014/02/4-2-14-john-passant-aust-national-university-canberra-end-of-the-age-of-entitlement-for-the-needy-but-pandering-to-the-lusts-of-the-greedy.mp3 (0)

Time for a House Un-Australian Activities Committee?
Tony Abbott thinks the Australian Broadcasting Corporation is Un-Australian. I am looking forward to his government setting up the House Un-Australian Activities Committee. (1)

Make Gina Rinehart work for her dole
(0)

Sick kids and paying upfront

(0)

Save Medicare

Demonstrate in defence of Medicare at Sydney Town Hall 1 pm Saturday 4 January (0)

Me on Razor Sharp this morning
Me interviewed by Sharon Firebrace this morning for Razor Sharp. It happens every Tuesday. http://sharonfirebrace.com/2013/12/03/john-passant-australian-national-university-8/ (0)

Advertisement

Links:

How could such a monster win?

No one expected Donald Trump to become the Republican nominee, and his election victory is a bigger shock–but the first step is to understand why and face it squarely write the editors of Socialist Worker US.
 

Republican presidential candidate, Donald Trump (Gage Skidmore)
 

AN ENDLESS, miserable presidential campaign is over–with the most miserable result imaginable.

Several readers of Socialist Worker with young children commented late last night on social media that they put their kids to bed with assurances that the monster wouldn’t win–and they dreaded explaining how “It” could happen. We all know how they feel.

Donald Trump’s victory exposes how decrepit the U.S. political system has become after decades of two-party oligarchical rule. This is a man with ties to the racist far right, a pathological narcissist who entered the race intending to boost his media brand, and who horrifies and disgusts not just millions of working people, but a majority of the American ruling class.

And still he won the election for president of the United States. What a testimonial for the “world’s greatest democracy.”

It will take days and weeks to process the full implications of Donald Trump being elected the next president of the United States. No one expected Trump to win the Republican nomination, and the same is true about the presidency. For sure, his victory will upend politics in the U.S. and internationally in ways we can’t predict.

There will be a lot of talk in the next weeks about how the election proves the U.S. is irretrievably right wing and backward. Trump’s victory is certainly due in part to his appeals to nationalism, immigrant-bashing and Islamophobia. The far right has been emboldened by Trump’s campaign, and the left will have to figure out how to confront it.

But if we’re going to succeed in that challenge and build a stronger left, we have to have some clarity about what led to this terrible result. Socialist Worker will try to take up these questions with all the depth they require in the coming days–but some initial conclusions are clear.

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

HAVING ABANDONED even rhetorical appeals to give confidence to the Democratic Party’s more liberal base so she could chase the votes of moderates and even dyed-in-the-wool, conservatives, Clinton left the field open to Trump to claim that his reactionary program would benefit the majority of people who have seen their living standards stagnate and decline, even in the period of “recovery” from the Great Recession.

The liberal base of the Democratic Party came through for Clinton. According to exit poll data, she won 88 percent of the Black vote and 65 percent from Latinos. It was the swing voters who Clinton courted that stuck with Trump.

Trump may well end up losing the popular vote–his victory was assured by the undemocratic Electoral College, enshrined in the Constitution by slave owners, that gives outsized influence to traditionally conservative rural states.

Still, with everything we know about him after this campaign, how could so many people vote for Trump?

His promises to stand up for the “little guy” are blatant lies to camouflage an agenda that will help the 1 Percent with gigantic tax giveaways and the like. But Clinton’s promise of continuing an intolerable status quo didn’t sound like a real alternative to people at the end of their rope.

Bernie Sanders’ left-wing campaign for the Democratic presidential nomination nearly upset Clinton by making an appeal to workers to challenge what he called the “billionaire class.” Clinton, who has spent her political career ingratiating herself to that class, managed to bury Sanders’ message–and rather than continue his “political revolution,” Sanders abandoned his opposition to whip up support for Clinton.

Clinton and Sanders and much of the rest of the political establishment, some Republicans included, criticized Trump’s ugly outrages. But because they never acknowledged the real economic grievances that he built his campaign around, they left the way clear for Trump to channel legitimate bitterness into scapegoating and scaremongering.

Even when Clinton did counter Trump’s racism, woman-hating, immigrant-bashing and Islamophobia, it rang hollow. As a personification of the insider Washington political establishment, Clinton bears responsibility–often directly–for policies that led to the mass incarceration of African American men, the sweeping deportation of immigrants and endless wars in Afghanistan and Iraq that have fueled anti-Arab and anti-Muslim bigotry.

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

RACISM HAS been central to the Trump campaign since his speech announcing his candidacy, when he referred to Mexican immigrants as rapists. But while the open bigots of the so-called alt-right have been a notable element of Trump’s supporters, racism alone can’t explain why states and counties that voted for Barack Obama in both 2008 and 2012 turned away from the Democrats this time.

Some of those voters were in states that Hillary Clinton was expected to win, like Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, where Trump scored points with his argument that U.S. workers lost jobs due to free trade deals and rising immigration. It was another grotesque lie. But the truth–that growing economic hardship is due to rising inequality that benefits the 1 Percent–wasn’t something that Hillary Clinton wanted to talk about.

The stomach-turning irony of this outcome is that Hillary Clinton and the rest of the Democratic establishment figured Trump would be their ideal opponent. He’s a buffoon and too extreme to be elected, they told themselves. All Clinton would have to do to beat Trump is “appear presidential” and tout her “preparedness” and “experience.”

But the Democratic Party brain trust didn’t understand what happened during the eight years of the Obama presidency, when they responded to the Great Recession by bailing out the banksters while doubling down on their commitment to neoliberalism and austerity cutbacks that balanced budgets on workers’ backs.

The living conditions of many millions of everyday people in the U.S. have deteriorated or stagnated. So when Trump decried the loss of decent-paying jobs and accused Clinton and the Democratic Party of throwing people to the wolves, some segment of the population believed–wrongly in fact, but with a feeling of urgency–that someone understood their pain.

Meanwhile, Hillary Clinton’s response to Trump’s pledge to make America great again was: “But wait, America is already great.”

When it came time to cast their ballots, enough people in the right states begged to differ. They decided to punish the establishment politician in favor of the outsider.

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

THE CONVENTIONAL media wisdom was stunned by this outcome, and so there will be a scramble for simple answers to explain away Election 2016: a fundamentally conservative population; the irretrievable racism of all white workers; even the impact of the Green Party’s Jill Stein, whose “crime” was to rightly insist that the greater evil can’t be stopped by championing the lesser evil.

We should refuse to accept those simple answers. One of the first challenges for the left will be to explain what happened in all its complexity. But there are many more challenges to come.

As the radical left warned, in defiance of calls for moderation from liberals, the right wing has been emboldened by Trumpism and needs to be confronted. But we can’t let the people most responsible for this mess point the finger at the most reactionary bigots. Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama and the Democratic Party need to answer for why they had nothing to offer as an alternative to Trump’s scapegoating.

We have a lot of work to do, starting today, to build a real left alternative that recognizes the misery and suffering so many people endure; that confronts these conditions politically and practically; and that builds organization capable of turning the tide.

Large numbers of people are already horrified by Trump and will be determined to take action to show their opposition. More will be spurred to act by the inevitable outrages of an arrogant right wing that oversteps–that’s a lesson from all of the right’s victories in recent elections. In the end, at least some of those who voted for Trump will come to understand that they abhor what he stands for.

But for now, we need to start building that resistance from the ground up. The first step is to understand the lessons and implications of this election and face them squarely–and then we move on from there.

Advertisement

Comments

Comment from Kay
Time November 10, 2016 at 8:50 am

Easy! Once enough ordinary workers get fed up with the elitist, patronising, minority-pandering, PC-dominated Left, they actually make the effort to stage a revolution! Not a socialist revolution, but a blue-collar worker-led revolution! And don’t forget, many women and even minority members voted for Trump too. They are just so fed up with the same-old same-old…..

Of course, Trump is not the messiah they think he is. Of course, Trump does not have all the answers. But at least he listened to what the ordinary ‘forgotten people’ were saying.

Labor only listens to the leftist elite and the unions. The Liberals at the moment are only listening to leftist public servants and the ABC. The Greens and the socialists only listen to young inexperienced welfare-dependent people and academic elitists. So who is listening to the ‘silent majority’? Sadly, only Pauline Hanson is picking up on this cohort of voters.

It is about time the Left Wing considers that if it pushes too far too fast there will be a Right Wing backlash. A moderate centre right/centre left government should be the aim – not some extreme Left or Right outcome.

Comment from dl
Time November 10, 2016 at 4:07 pm

Say what you you will John, but he shattered the Neoliberal establishment, against all odds. Truly like Brexit on steroids.
One point he has been insistent on (on most issues,, it is the exact opposite, and that includes immigration) is his opposition to the bipartisan consensus on Free Trade. Expect the TPP to be scrapped.
Also, he has the congressional mandate (if not the popular vote) to do pretty much whatever he pleases, although the article correctly states that he may have possible lost the popular vote. Shades of Bush in 2000.
He’ll also benefit from years of centralization of the Executive branch of the US gov’t at the expense of congress.
We are living in interesting times.

Comment from Fred
Time November 10, 2016 at 6:29 pm

Perhaps because people like you call him a monster. Calling people names is hardly going to change their votes.

Comment from peter piper
Time November 11, 2016 at 8:08 am

Uk, Brexit, Australia, USA and soon Germany. When will you champagne socialists wake and realise that nobody is interested in a ‘socialist alternative’? Its been tried and always fails miserably

Comment from Lycaon
Time November 11, 2016 at 8:57 pm

John,

Utter nonsense. Socialist Worker once again gives its backhanded support to the Democratic Party, the party of the police state, the national security state, the warmongers and gaolers, and the self-seeking purveyors of identity politics.

Can we not draw the conclusion that in mourning this defeat of Hillary ‘we came, we saw, he died’ Clinton and the decrepit liberalism of the Democratic Party, the Socialist Worker and the ISO represent a slightly more pink but no less bankrupt version of the same?

It is time you held these erstwhile comrades of yours to account for their political charlatanism.

Comment from John
Time November 13, 2016 at 6:42 pm

You must have read a different article to me.