ga('send', 'pageview');
John Passant

Site menu:

October 2010
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Tags

Archives

RSS Oz House

Share

Authors

Subscribe to us

Get new blog posts delivered to your inbox.


RSS Blog RSS

Site search

Miniposts

My interview Razor Sharp 18 February
Me interviewed by Sharon Firebrace on Razor Sharp on Tuesday 18 February. http://sharonfirebrace.files.wordpress.com/2014/02/18-2-14-john-passant-aust-national-university-g20-meeting-age-of-enttilement-engineers-attack-of-austerity-hardship-on-civilians.mp3 (0)

My interview Razor Sharp 11 February 2014
Me interviewed by Sharon Firebrace on Razor Sharp this morning. The Royal Commission, car industry and age of entitlement get a lot of the coverage. http://sharonfirebrace.com/2014/02/11/john-passant-aust-national-university-canberra-2/ (0)

Razor Sharp 4 February 2014
Me on 4 February 2014 on Razor Sharp with Sharon Firebrace. http://sharonfirebrace.files.wordpress.com/2014/02/4-2-14-john-passant-aust-national-university-canberra-end-of-the-age-of-entitlement-for-the-needy-but-pandering-to-the-lusts-of-the-greedy.mp3 (0)

Time for a House Un-Australian Activities Committee?
Tony Abbott thinks the Australian Broadcasting Corporation is Un-Australian. I am looking forward to his government setting up the House Un-Australian Activities Committee. (1)

Make Gina Rinehart work for her dole
(0)

Sick kids and paying upfront

(0)

Save Medicare

Demonstrate in defence of Medicare at Sydney Town Hall 1 pm Saturday 4 January (0)

Me on Razor Sharp this morning
Me interviewed by Sharon Firebrace this morning for Razor Sharp. It happens every Tuesday. http://sharonfirebrace.com/2013/12/03/john-passant-australian-national-university-8/ (0)

I am not surprised
I think we are being unfair to this Abbott ‘no surprises’ Government. I am not surprised. (0)

Send Barnaby to Indonesia
It is a pity that Barnaby Joyce, a man of tact, diplomacy, nuance and subtlety, isn’t going to Indonesia to fix things up. I know I am disappointed that Barnaby is missing out on this great opportunity, and I am sure the Indonesians feel the same way. [Sarcasm alert.] (0)

Advertisement

Links:

Is boycotting Israel anti-semitic?

Sherry Wolf, a member of the International Jewish Anti-Zionist Network, responds in Socialist Worker to claims from supporters of Zionism that criticism of Israel–and in particular, the movement for boycott, divestment and sanctions against it–is “anti-Semitic.”

ISRAEL’S SUPPORTERS wield the accusation that Palestine solidarity activists who support a boycott of Israel are guilty of anti-Semitism.

Because this charge is so repugnant to progressives, as Zionists are all too aware, it can have the effect of shutting down any debate about Israel’s crimes. In particular, the charge is leveled at the global movement for boycott, divestment and sanctions (BDS) against Israel, which seeks a campaign until Israel “meets its obligation to recognize the Palestinian people’s inalienable right to self-determination and fully complies with international law,” as stated in the BDS call to action.

The outlandish charges by Israel’s defenders against pro-Palestine activists reach the heights of hysteria on Web sites like BoycottIsrael.org.uk, which falsely poses as “The official boycott Israel site” and is headlined, “The real Palestine story is just anti-Semitism re-branded–instigated and supported by the storm troopers of our time.”

There you have it. According to them, support for a boycott of Israel, which acts in open defiance of international laws and any unbiased person’s moral code, is nouveau-Nazism.

This accusation is not simply an odious lie, it is an attempt to manipulate hatred of anti-Semitism to draw attention away from the ongoing Israeli crimes of dispossession, systematic racism, collective punishment and wholesale warfare on a population guilty of nothing other than their own existence.

It is an old debaters’ ruse that when you don’t have the facts on your side, change the subject. That’s what the charge of anti-Semitism is really all about.

When Zionists claim that acts of anti-Semitism, which are on the rise in some places, are the result of the BDS movement, activists must confidently confront them with reality. The BDS movement has always condemned anti-Semitism in all its forms, and none of its materials nor actions make appeals to anti-Jewish sentiment.

Omar Barghouti, a BDS movement leader, visited Rome last spring, and this is how journalist Max Blumenthal reported on his response to this mischaracterization of the boycott campaign:

Regarding the accusation of anti-Semitism frequently leveled at BDS, he replied that such an accusation is in itself anti-Semitic, inasmuch as it creates an equivalence between all Jews and Israeli policies, implying that Jews are monolithic, and that all Jews should be held responsible for Israel’s actions.

Such generalizations and the idea of collective Jewish responsibility are fundamentally anti-Semitic. He called upon Europeans to stop assuaging their Holocaust guilt by oppressing the victims of the victims of the Holocaust.

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

KNOWING THE history of Palestinian oppression is indispensable in combating this myth.

The expulsion in 1948 of nearly 700,000 Palestinians from their homeland as part of a colonial-settler project undertaken by Zionists and supported by the United States is an uncontestable point of history, about which anyone is welcome to their own opinion, but not their own version of the facts. It happened.

As Israeli-born Jewish historian Ilan Pappé writes in A History of Modern Palestine:

Out of about 850,000 Palestinians living in the territories designated by the UN as a Jewish state, only 160,000 remained [by 1949] on or nearby their land and homes. Those who remained became the Palestinian minority in Israel. The rest were expelled or fled under the threat of expulsion, and a few thousand died in massacres.

Palestinians were driven from their land, some by the self-described terrorists of the Zionist Irgun and Stern Gang. Today, most of the world’s Palestinian population lives in exile outside of Israel and in the Palestine Occupied Territories, with no right to return to the land of their ancestors. This refusal of return is in stark contrast to the Law of Return that virtually guarantees citizenship to Jews from around the world–even if they have no family there, have never before visited, nor speak the Hebrew language.

The horrifying conditions of malnutrition, mass unemployment and wholesale deprivation in the Gaza Strip are often detailed by SocialistWorker.org, as are the atrocious facts of life for those Arabs living in the West Bank, where hundreds of miles of separation walls with militarized checkpoints confine the daily lives of every Palestinian.

But less is written about Palestinian citizens of Israel–those who live outside of the Occupied Territories of the West Bank and Gaza, but inside the borders of Israel–who live under a separate set of laws. That is, they live under apartheid conditions. If not for the horrors of the Holocaust, most people would readily agree that a nation with privileges and rights for one ethnic group and not the others is racist. By any objective measure, Israel is, in fact, a racist state.

For example, all residents of Israel must register their ethnicity–Jewish, Arab, Druze–because different rights accrue to different peoples, and all must carry identity cards that have this information at all times. Non-Jews of Israel, of whom there are more than 1 million, are treated more like residents without a nationality or equal rights.

This became shockingly clear in July when a Palestinian Israeli man was convicted of raping a Jewish Israeli woman in Jerusalem even though the couple had consensual sex. Because the man had lied about his nationality and deceived her, he was convicted of rape.

As Jewish Israeli journalist Gideon Levy argued, “I would like to raise only one question with the judge. What if this guy had been a Jew who pretended to be a Muslim and had sex with a Muslim woman? Would he have been convicted of rape? The answer is: of course not.”

Ninety-three percent of the land in Israel is nationalized and controlled by the Jewish National Fund and the Jewish Agency, which denies Arabs the right to buy or even rent land, while Jews can easily do so.

Facts are facts. Israel claims to be a Jewish state that aims to “transfer,” better known as cleanse, Palestinians in order to maintain its demographic Jewish majority. Therefore, it is trying to taint a global justice movement with charges of anti-Semitism so that Israel will not be turned into a pariah state for its apartheid laws and unconscionable war crimes.

That some people in the world might falsely conflate Judaism with Zionism is perhaps because the state of Israel does so itself. That is not a brush Zionists can paint the BDS movement with, however.

Jews such as Pappé, Levy, Blumenthal and a growing army of lesser-known pro-Palestinian Jews, including myself, are willing to call out Israel for its thwarting of international law and basic norms of humanity. And we especially, the children and grandchildren of the Holocaust generation, will not allow accusations of anti-Semitism to muddy the waters.

The BDS movement is a struggle for social, political and economic justice. Join it.

Sherry Wolf is the author of Sexuality and Socialism: History, Politics and Theory of LGBT Liberation and an associate editor of the International Socialist Review. Her writing has also appeared in the Nation, CounterPunch and New Politics. She was on the executive committee of the 2009 National Equality March.

Advertisement

Comments

Comment from Arjay
Time October 7, 2010 at 9:28 pm

The Zionists have hidden behind the skirts of victim status for too long.The Nazis were good teachers.The are now effecting on the Palistinians what the Nazis did to the Jews.

Zionism/Nazism has nothing to do with
race or religion.It is an arrogant state of mind driven by deep insecurity that sees those outside the tribe as being inferior, thus expendible.

Comment from A NON FARMER
Time October 8, 2010 at 2:14 pm

Dear Arjay,
Any sort of ‘ism’ anyone might adopt can be used for evil.
In my experience just about any fellowship or association man has ever devised has been ‘whiteanted’ at some time or other.
In fact at this time in my life the experience of this sort of thing almost has me believing that there is some overruling entity or personification of evil that runs the show from behind the scenes.
Either that or the whole load of humanity is indeed crazy beyond redemption. (except for the Dalai Lama, of course)

Dear John,
If we could tear history asunder and somehow put the leaders of the ‘Secular State of Israel’ in the dock beside the Nazis at Nuremburg and have them similarly arraigned it might well be that they would be equally condemned.

Now good fellows – if you combine these two observations and roll them about your brain for a few secs you’ll come to realize that Israel only began to get an internationally recognised bad reputation after it had become a nation state.

I am convinced beyond doubt that there are thousands of Jewish citizens of the Israeli state who absolutely abhor the way the state of Israel and certain groups of and within Israel are treating Palestinians, other Islamic people and gentiles in general.

But of course the lessons of our relatively linearly perceived history are never learned. Consequently the modern secular state of Israel has for all intents and purposed become somehow ‘whiteanted by groups and individuals, some of whom act as badly as the once oppressors of Jewry, the Nazis.

Comment from Marco
Time October 8, 2010 at 3:59 pm

Sherry Wolf’s pronouncement is a valuable and courageous one. It should be welcome by all peoples of good will, especially so by the Jewish communities outside Israel, and the fraction of Israeli Jews of good sense.

Some circles of the State of Israel have found it tactically convenient to establish a kind of alliance with the religious right wing in Western countries, including Australia. With this alliance they get free hand to do with Palestinians as they please.

So, this “alliance” can be advantageous to those groups, in the short run. But it comes with risks.

Let’s remember one thing: Jews and socialists, Jews and members of other ethnic and religious minorities (including the Roma); Jews and people of mixed race, were often together, as inmates of concentration camps.

Those concentration camps were run by right wingers (many of them, in fact, quite religious, conservative businessmen), not socialists, or Palestinians.

If any Jewish reader sees this, you should keep this in mind.

Comment from Aionalrjay
Time October 8, 2010 at 7:23 pm

A Non Farmer,we live in an oligarcy whereby Corporate power has now subdued our Govts.There are about 80 large corporate entities that currently rule the planet.Basically it is done via the banking system.The International Reserve Banks virtually own all the new production of our economies by virtue of creating the new money.They create it in their computers as debt, when in fact it should be created as a tax credit via Govt created infrastructure.

See http://secretofoz.com/ Down load this excellent doco with two international awards for the way of a new economic renaissance.

Comment from Nick Nack
Time October 13, 2010 at 1:51 pm

Its not suprising that SAlt comes across as anti-semitic even if it doesnt intend to be, the regular 2 minute hate directed at ‘Israel’ is a good giveaway. Endlessly turning a blind eye to religiously inspired Islamic hatred of Jews (its in black and white in the Quraan for all to read) also makes SAlt look like a bunch of screaming hypocrites or delusional ignoramuses. Israel has blood on its hands yes, but there’s as much on many of the nations in the area, including perpetrated on the Palestinians pre-1948. Does SAlt ignore other heinous human rights violations like say Tibet for fear of upsetting the Chinese?

Write a comment