ga('send', 'pageview');
John Passant

Site menu:

May 2014
« Apr   Jun »



RSS Oz House



Subscribe to us

Get new blog posts delivered to your inbox.


Site search


Keep socialist blog En Passant going - donate now
If you want to keep a blog that makes the arguments every day against the ravages of capitalism going and keeps alive the flame of democracy and community, make a donation to help cover my costs. And of course keep reading the blog. To donate click here. Keep socialist blog En Passant going. More... (4)

Sprouting sh*t for almost nothing
You can prove my 2 ex-comrades wrong by donating to my blog En Passant at BSB: 062914 Account: 1067 5257, the Commonwealth Bank in Tuggeranong, ACT. More... (12)

My interview Razor Sharp 18 February
Me interviewed by Sharon Firebrace on Razor Sharp on Tuesday 18 February. (0)

My interview Razor Sharp 11 February 2014
Me interviewed by Sharon Firebrace on Razor Sharp this morning. The Royal Commission, car industry and age of entitlement get a lot of the coverage. (0)

Razor Sharp 4 February 2014
Me on 4 February 2014 on Razor Sharp with Sharon Firebrace. (0)

Time for a House Un-Australian Activities Committee?
Tony Abbott thinks the Australian Broadcasting Corporation is Un-Australian. I am looking forward to his government setting up the House Un-Australian Activities Committee. (1)

Make Gina Rinehart work for her dole

Sick kids and paying upfront


Save Medicare

Demonstrate in defence of Medicare at Sydney Town Hall 1 pm Saturday 4 January (0)

Me on Razor Sharp this morning
Me interviewed by Sharon Firebrace this morning for Razor Sharp. It happens every Tuesday. (0)



The World Cup and the battle for Brazil’s cities

Henrique Sanchez in Socialist Worker UK says big business will be the real winner of the World Cup—while ordinary Brazilians are losing their homes

A meeting in Belo Horizonte, Brazil, organised by the National Articulation of Popular Committees asks "Who loses with mega-events?" (Pic: Agência Brasil)

A meeting in Belo Horizonte, Brazil, organised by the National Articulation of Popular Committees asks “Who loses with mega-events?” (Pic: Agência Brasil)


This year’s World Cup and the 2016 Olympics are at the centre of a battle to reshape Brazil’s cities.

Firstly this means the removal of families in poor working class neighbourhoods. A recent study estimated that 250,000 people have been thrown out of their homes.

The process of ethnic cleansing and gentrification—pushing many poor and working people to more distant areas—aims to deepen a reorganisation of cities already underway.

New areas have been allocated for real estate speculation and large planned business districts where market interests prevail.

The anger at being denied the right to the city fuelled huge protests against rising public transport costs last year.

When Brazil was chosen to host these events, politicians and football officials promised that no public money would be used to build stadiums.

They said investments for the events would meet demands for public services, especially public transport.

But people quickly realised that hosting the World Cup was nothing more than big business, largely financed by public resources.

Emergency laws were approved that grant tax exemption to international football governing body, Fifa, and define exclusive sale and access areas for its sponsors.

This chases out informal workers and merchants, and denies the basic constitutional right to come and go.

The Fifa Local Organising Committee includes football officials who were involved in corruption scandals.

The World Cup also served as an excuse to privatise airports.


Major construction firms greatly benefited from building and renovating stadiums in 12 host cities—again financed with tax exemptions and state loans at preferential interest rates.

There have now been around 25 strikes of construction workers in World Cup stadiums demanding decent pay and conditions.

Several strikes occurred spontaneously without the support of the unions. In some the bosses asked for police repression—and they got it.

The World Cup revealed to the world the reality faced by Brazilian workers, especially in the construction industry.

As well as complaints of bullying bosses and disrespect of labour laws, eight workers died building stadiums after of a lack of safety measures.

Fifa has been given more public resources amid pressure over unfinished stadiums.

Even a local governor in the ruling Workers’ Party (PT) complained that “accepting the conditions imposed by Fifa was a trap”.

But the federal government—which the PT has run since 2003—and state governments run by right-wing opposition parties have acted as agents for Fifa.

There have been several demonstrations against the impacts of the football competition.

One of the most important movements in this struggle is the National Articulation of Popular Committees.

This is a national coalition of activists against the World Cup’s social impacts.

It has opposed emergency laws and defended housing, freedom of protest and the right to the city.

Actions and demonstrations are planned before and during the World Cup, including a national day of protest on 15 May.

With one month to go, the only certainty we have about the World Cup is that it will see much struggle in Brazil.

And international solidarity can help the fight.

Henrique Sanchez is a socialist based in São Paulo



Pingback from The World Cup and the battle for Brazil’s cities | OzHouse
Time May 11, 2014 at 7:11 pm

[…] May 11 2014 by admin […]

Comment from Jim Brash
Time May 12, 2014 at 1:33 am

The Brazilian government will do all it can to hide the conditions of the poor, the orphaned, and the homeless while all of the world’s media has its eyes on it. The world cup is a cash cow for big capitalists and politicians in Brazil. The gentrification of cities is happening here in the US as well. Its about land grabs and pushing the poor into being in a position of out of sight, out of mind. I’m looking forward to the world cup and Germany beating Brazil in the final, but I’m not looking forward to the toll that would be paid by workers and peasants in its aftermath.