ga('send', 'pageview');
John Passant

Site menu:

June 2014
« May   Jul »



RSS Oz House



Subscribe to us

Get new blog posts delivered to your inbox.


Site search


Keep socialist blog En Passant going - donate now
If you want to keep a blog that makes the arguments every day against the ravages of capitalism going and keeps alive the flame of democracy and community, make a donation to help cover my costs. And of course keep reading the blog. To donate click here. Keep socialist blog En Passant going. More... (4)

Sprouting sh*t for almost nothing
You can prove my 2 ex-comrades wrong by donating to my blog En Passant at BSB: 062914 Account: 1067 5257, the Commonwealth Bank in Tuggeranong, ACT. More... (12)

My interview Razor Sharp 18 February
Me interviewed by Sharon Firebrace on Razor Sharp on Tuesday 18 February. (0)

My interview Razor Sharp 11 February 2014
Me interviewed by Sharon Firebrace on Razor Sharp this morning. The Royal Commission, car industry and age of entitlement get a lot of the coverage. (0)

Razor Sharp 4 February 2014
Me on 4 February 2014 on Razor Sharp with Sharon Firebrace. (0)

Time for a House Un-Australian Activities Committee?
Tony Abbott thinks the Australian Broadcasting Corporation is Un-Australian. I am looking forward to his government setting up the House Un-Australian Activities Committee. (1)

Make Gina Rinehart work for her dole

Sick kids and paying upfront


Save Medicare

Demonstrate in defence of Medicare at Sydney Town Hall 1 pm Saturday 4 January (0)

Me on Razor Sharp this morning
Me interviewed by Sharon Firebrace this morning for Razor Sharp. It happens every Tuesday. (0)



Those complaining about protests are only harming their cause

FUN FACT: When Annabelle Crabb is not telling student protesters they are caricatures from a bygone era, she hosts “Kitchen Cabinet”.

Let me be clear, writes Louise O’Shea in Red Flag: I wholeheartedly support the right of overpaid columnists, Liberal politicians and shock jocks to ridicule and deride protests. I respect that they have a system to defend and mates in the Business Council to worry about – good people who are doing it tough as a result of this unpopular budget. But I have to admit my dismay at the way some of them have gone about it lately. I fear they are only alienating people and undermining their cause.

For instance, was it really the best move to send Amanda Vanstone into the frontline of battle against disaffected youth? Did it occur to no one that it might be irksome for such a wealthy and privileged figure to attack so savagely those in the firing line of the government’s budget? Let’s face it: someone who personally sat on the Commission of Audit labelling student protesters “disguised louts” and “thugs” was never going to go down well. Total own goal.

And the touchy feely types are no better. Annabel Crabb, for one, has discredited liberals everywhere with her argument that protest is outdated in the age of Facebook and Twitter. Perhaps her judgment has been affected by too much wining and dining with politicians, but does she really believe that any self-respecting university student today thinks that expressing sad feelings in cyberspace about the corporatisation of education is going to have any impact on government? Indeed, where would we be if the Egyptians in Tahrir Square had thought that?

Claiming that hash-tags are as effective as action will only alienate those who might otherwise be convinced to give up on social change. Today’s information-age youth just won’t buy that, and modern day admonishing techniques need to adjust accordingly.

I am furthermore not at all convinced that hearts and minds will be won through defending the right of Liberal government figures and right wing ideologues to swan around university campuses without interruption.

Sure, media commentators may know these people as old school mates, neighbours and friends, but let’s not forget that students are familiar with them only insofar as they have been responsible for trashing higher education. And is anyone really surprised when students object to security guards assaulting them simply because they asked a challenging question of a public figure?

The assumption is that the rich and powerful are entitled to respect “just because” might have cut the mustard in 1969, but today’s tech-savvy youth want credible, properly researched reprimanding.

The radicals among them won’t be demoralised, nor the waverers coopted, if respectable hand-wringing fails to move with the times. Winning people to relying on the ALP to change things, or to accepting the status quo, will take more than ill-informed arguments that everyone’s heard a thousand times before. If protests are ever to become hopelessly timid, ineffective and easy to ignore – and I think this is what we would all like to see – media pundits simply must do better.

The misguided tactics being adopted by today’s social commentators, led no doubt by a minority within them hell-bent on fomenting trouble, are only encouraging further protest. This in turn is giving the masses a sense of their own collective power, strengthening their organisations and leading to a deeper understanding of the issues involved – and no one wins from that. Worse still, it is enabling the media to portray politicians – those who should command the greatest respect – as weak and vulnerable. This only corrupts our great democracy, the crushing uniformity of which is the envy of the world.

I am not pretending to have all the answers to how pundits today might better sell passivity and apathy to an increasingly restive public. It might be that all that is possible is to decry protesters as violent and a threat to civilisation and hope for the best (and that no one mentions the $12 billion being spent on fighter jets to kill people). But it is certainly incumbent on them to try.



Pingback from Those complaining about protests are only harming their cause | OzHouse
Time June 2, 2014 at 7:12 pm

[…] Jun 02 2014 by admin […]

Comment from Hasbeen
Time June 3, 2014 at 10:13 am

Thanks for the article John, it says a lot.

It helps in understanding the personality that has to have a “cause”

It explains the religious rabid fundamentalist.

It gives us something of an insight into the ratbag greenie.

It helps explain the political activist.

Most of us don’t have a cause. We don’t need a prop to help hold us up, & give some meaning to our lives. We find meaning in the simple things, family, building a home, & enjoying all the physical pleasures we have available to us.

We don’t need to be passionate about some cause to make our life worth living. We don’t even have to try to force others to submit to our ideas of how to live

I suppose I should fee sorry for those with such a need to add meaning to their lives, but I don’t.

I don’t because so many of you are living it up on the public payroll, from university types to dole bludgers at Nimbin, depending on the work of others for their daily bread, but refusing to let their providers get on with their own lives without being harangued by those with a cause.

Comment from John
Time June 3, 2014 at 1:30 pm

Good analysis has been. Do you double as a writer for the Murdoch press too?