ga('send', 'pageview');
John Passant

Site menu:

October 2014
« Sep   Nov »



RSS Oz House



Subscribe to us

Get new blog posts delivered to your inbox.


Site search


Keep socialist blog En Passant going - donate now
If you want to keep a blog that makes the arguments every day against the ravages of capitalism going and keeps alive the flame of democracy and community, make a donation to help cover my costs. And of course keep reading the blog. To donate click here. Keep socialist blog En Passant going. More... (4)

Sprouting sh*t for almost nothing
You can prove my 2 ex-comrades wrong by donating to my blog En Passant at BSB: 062914 Account: 1067 5257, the Commonwealth Bank in Tuggeranong, ACT. More... (12)

My interview Razor Sharp 18 February
Me interviewed by Sharon Firebrace on Razor Sharp on Tuesday 18 February. (0)

My interview Razor Sharp 11 February 2014
Me interviewed by Sharon Firebrace on Razor Sharp this morning. The Royal Commission, car industry and age of entitlement get a lot of the coverage. (0)

Razor Sharp 4 February 2014
Me on 4 February 2014 on Razor Sharp with Sharon Firebrace. (0)

Time for a House Un-Australian Activities Committee?
Tony Abbott thinks the Australian Broadcasting Corporation is Un-Australian. I am looking forward to his government setting up the House Un-Australian Activities Committee. (1)

Make Gina Rinehart work for her dole

Sick kids and paying upfront


Save Medicare

Demonstrate in defence of Medicare at Sydney Town Hall 1 pm Saturday 4 January (0)

Me on Razor Sharp this morning
Me interviewed by Sharon Firebrace this morning for Razor Sharp. It happens every Tuesday. (0)



The British left must unite to be an alternative

It’s fashionable to argue that contemporary “anti-politics” involves a rejection of the very form of the party. But thousands of Scots have flooded into the pro independence parties since the referendum produced events like this in Glasgows George Square

It’s fashionable to argue that contemporary “anti-politics” involves a rejection of the very form of the party. But thousands of Scots have flooded into the pro independence parties since the referendum produced events like this in Glasgow’s George Square (Pic: Andrew McGowan)

The media cliche machine has been in overdrive since the by-elections on Thursday of last week writes Alex Callinicos in Socialist Worker UK. Tedious though this is, undoubtedly something big has happened.

One could put it like this. Over the past few decades the popular base of the two main parties has been gradually eroding—members and voters alike.

But there are moments when a step-change takes place.

One was at the May 2010 general election. Defeated Labour and the supposedly victorious Tories got 65 percent of the vote between them, and Britain had its first peacetime coalition government since 1939.

We have seen another step-change in the past few weeks. The social base of the big Westminster parties has continued to rot away. The Tories have pursued unpopular austerity policies. These have damaged them and caused a collapse in support for the Liberal Democrats.

Meanwhile, Labour has got the worst of both worlds. Ed Miliband inched the party a few millimetres to the left, antagonising the Blairites and their media chums.

But he has also embraced what Unite union general secretary Len McCluskey called “austerity-lite”.

This means he has totally failed to express the anger of millions of working class people who have felt their lives get worse thanks to successive bouts of neoliberalism.

So that anger has found other channels. What is particularly interesting is the divergence between these channels north and south of the border.

In Scotland this has been provided by the Yes campaign, which took a predominantly progressive form. The Scottish National Party (SNP) seized the initiative when first minister Alex Salmond reframed independence as the way to save the welfare state from the Tories.

Though a final intervention by Labour managed to save the Union, it was at a high price. The vote split on class lines.

Every Labour parliamentary seat in Glasgow voted Yes. Further north middle class constituencies that traditionally support the SNP—including Salmond’s own—voted No.


Interestingly, Scotland since the referendum has bucked the trend.

It’s fashionable to argue that contemporary “anti-politics” involves a rejection of the very form of the party. But parties that were pro-independence such as the SNP, Greens, and Scottish Socialist Party have seen a huge influx of members.

Alas, in England the main beneficiary of the rebellion against the party system have been the racist populists of Ukip. Anyone who thinks that this mainly hits the Tories should reflect on the fact that Clacton—where Douglas Carswell was triumphantly re-elected last week on the Ukip ticket—was a Labour seat until 2005.

We shouldn’t overstate the scale of what’s happening. The latest Opinium/Observer poll has Labour on 35 percent, the Tories on 28 percent, Ukip on 17 percent, and the Lib Dems on 9 percent.

Nigel Farage isn’t going to be walking into 10 Downing Street next May. Nevertheless, Britain is moving to a four or even five-party system (including the SNP).

What’s missing is the radical left. The party system is fragmenting above all because of the experience of neoliberalism. Yet a strong voice challenging neoliberalism is absent from the electoral field.

There’s no objective reason for this. The British electoral system works against small parties, but it can be beaten, as George Galloway and Respect proved before Ukip.

The social democratic ideas that the SNP under Salmond has successfully appealed to are as strong in popular consciousness south of the border as they are in Scotland.

The problem is the extreme fragmentation of the radical left, compounded by the mutual hostility that exists among these fragments. This is, if anything, worse in Scotland than it is in England and Wales. Wallowing in the rights and wrongs of these divisions is futile and self-destructive.

The combination of the Scottish referendum and Ukip’s rise demands that we change.

We have to shake off the petty narcissism of our different projects and work together to create united left wing alternatives to neoliberalism both sides of the border.

History will judge us very harshly if we fail.



Comment from Michael Biggs
Time October 16, 2014 at 11:48 pm

He says “there is no objective reason for this” (the absence of a strong voice challenging neoliberalism). But everyone, except people who identify as socialists, knows that there is a very obvious set of reasons: “socialism” is a word that is permanently linked in the public mind to tyranny, violent revolution, oppressive bureaucracy and mass murder. And there is no sign that anyone has a clue about a credible path from where we are now to viable non-capitalist society. Greens etc are working on it (a bit) but no socialists are even trying, because they are clinging to old concepts and language (eg class) which means nothing to intelligent young people looking for less exploitative ways of living nowadays.

Comment from Kay
Time October 17, 2014 at 6:45 am


Good comments! I agree.