ga('send', 'pageview');
John Passant

Site menu:

August 2015
M T W T F S S
« Jul   Sep »
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31  

Tags

Archives

RSS Oz House

Share

Authors

Subscribe to us

Get new blog posts delivered to your inbox.


RSS Blog RSS

Site search

Miniposts

Keep socialist blog En Passant going - donate now
If you want to keep a blog that makes the arguments every day against the ravages of capitalism going and keeps alive the flame of democracy and community, make a donation to help cover my costs. And of course keep reading the blog. To donate click here. Keep socialist blog En Passant going. More... (4)

Sprouting sh*t for almost nothing
You can prove my 2 ex-comrades wrong by donating to my blog En Passant at BSB: 062914 Account: 1067 5257, the Commonwealth Bank in Tuggeranong, ACT. More... (12)

My interview Razor Sharp 18 February
Me interviewed by Sharon Firebrace on Razor Sharp on Tuesday 18 February. http://sharonfirebrace.files.wordpress.com/2014/02/18-2-14-john-passant-aust-national-university-g20-meeting-age-of-enttilement-engineers-attack-of-austerity-hardship-on-civilians.mp3 (0)

My interview Razor Sharp 11 February 2014
Me interviewed by Sharon Firebrace on Razor Sharp this morning. The Royal Commission, car industry and age of entitlement get a lot of the coverage. http://sharonfirebrace.com/2014/02/11/john-passant-aust-national-university-canberra-2/ (0)

Razor Sharp 4 February 2014
Me on 4 February 2014 on Razor Sharp with Sharon Firebrace. http://sharonfirebrace.files.wordpress.com/2014/02/4-2-14-john-passant-aust-national-university-canberra-end-of-the-age-of-entitlement-for-the-needy-but-pandering-to-the-lusts-of-the-greedy.mp3 (0)

Time for a House Un-Australian Activities Committee?
Tony Abbott thinks the Australian Broadcasting Corporation is Un-Australian. I am looking forward to his government setting up the House Un-Australian Activities Committee. (1)

Make Gina Rinehart work for her dole
(0)

Sick kids and paying upfront

(0)

Save Medicare

Demonstrate in defence of Medicare at Sydney Town Hall 1 pm Saturday 4 January (0)

Me on Razor Sharp this morning
Me interviewed by Sharon Firebrace this morning for Razor Sharp. It happens every Tuesday. http://sharonfirebrace.com/2013/12/03/john-passant-australian-national-university-8/ (0)

Advertisement

Links:

WorkChoices – it’s back

One of the bosses’ best economic think tanks, the working class taxpayer funded Government agency the Productivity Commission has released its Workplace Relations Framework Draft Report.

It recommended (at p 25 of the overview) ‘that Sunday rates in the hospitality, entertainment, retailing, restaurants and cafes industries should be brought into line with Saturday rates. ‘

There are 4 million workers who work Saturday or Sunday. Contrary to popular stereotyping, many are not students but rather a mother or father giving up time with their kids to earn much need income to put food on the table for them.

Tony Abbott has a clear choice. He can rule out any attack on penalty rates or come clean and tell the hospitality, retail and other targeted workers who are paid Sunday penalty rates why he wants to cut their wages and steal the food from their tables.

Echoing the hated individual contracts in WorkChoices called Australian Workplace Agreements, but also recognising the massive opposition to those individual contracts, the Productivity Commission has suggested a compromise. At page 37 of the draft it says:

‘… the Productivity Commission is floating the option of a new type of statutory arrangement — the enterprise contract (figure 9).

‘This would permit employers to vary an award for entire classes of employees (level 1 retail employees, for example), or for a group of particular employees, without having to negotiate with each party individually or to form an enterprise agreement.

‘It would effectively amount to a collective individual flexibility arrangement, but with some further flexibility. Employers could offer it to all prospective employees as a condition of employment (resembling enterprise agreements, where new employees are covered by an existing agreement when they are hired). No employee ballot would be required for the adoption of an enterprise contract, nor would any employee group be involved in its preparation and agreement unless the employer wished this to be the case. As in enterprise agreements, employers and individual employees could still negotiate individual flexibility arrangements as carve outs from the enterprise contract if they mutually agreed.’

Yes, giving the bosses the power to set the employment terms without ‘interference’ from unions should work well for employees. It would if adopted no doubt see a massive increase in wages and better conditions.  [Sarcasm alert.]

Again Abbott has a clear choice. He can reject the revival of AWAs in another guise or explain to those millions of workers who rejected this approach at the 2007 election why he wants to give the bosses the power to set and thus cut wages.

On the minimum wage the Commission says at page 15 that, ‘given the highly adverse outcomes of unemployment for people’s wellbeing, whenever the economy is weakening (as appears to be the case now), there are grounds for the FWC [Fair Work Commission] to temporarily adopt a conservative approach to minimum wage setting.’  While this is couched in terms of employment and not being a real cut, the end result is undermining the minimum wage and with it the many award wages dependent on it.

Again Abbott has a clear choice. He can reject cutting the minimum wage or explain to the millions dependent on it why their wages are not increasing enough from their already pitiful levels  to match increased costs.

The draft report also wants to water down unfair dismissal protections. At page 28 it says:

‘Moderate and incremental reforms can address the current flaws, while leaving much of the existing legislation and its legitimate protections intact:

• The Fair Work Act should be amended so that procedural errors alone are not sufficient to award compensation or restore employment in what would otherwise be regarded as a valid dismissal. Nevertheless, procedural errors by an employer should, at the discretion of the FWC, lead to either advice to the employer, or where serious or repeated, financial penalties.

• There should be more upfront filters that focus on the merits of claims.

• Somewhat higher lodgment fees may also assist in limiting the automatic recourse to the FWC, but these would likely have to be tailored to an employee’s income, and vary depending on whether conciliation or arbitration was being sought. The Productivity Commission is seeking more views on this.

• To reduce some of the present inconsistencies, the governance of the FWC should be reformed along the lines discussed earlier.

• The emphasis on reinstatement as the primary goal of the unfair dismissal provisions should be removed. Good legislation should not give primacy to a goal that is rarely achieved and not necessarily even in the interests of the parties involved.

• The above reforms, complemented by further targeted provision of information and regulator engagement with small business, will deal with many of the current issues experienced by small businesses. Subject to implementation of these reforms, the Small Business Fair Dismissal Code should be removed. The basic premise of assisting small business to navigate the complexities of unfair dismissal legislation is reasonable, but the Code does not achieve that outcome and provides a false sense of security.’

Abbott has a clear choice – reject easing the unfair dismissal laws or explain to workers why they can be sacked on the whim of a boss..

The Abbott government will not reject the attacks on penalty rates, the minimum wage slow down, relaxing the unfair dismissal laws or condemn individual contracts that will undermine pay rates for all workers. It will say it is just a draft; it is a report To government, not from government; it is really just fine tuning what is already there; in the national interest we should all work together to address significant challenges to the economy and jobs, etc etc etc. What this all boils down to is making the working class pay for the crisis of profitability gathering pace in Australia.  If the ruling class get these changes through that will open the floodgates for the next set of attacks from the insatiable bosses.

The union movement will argue that is why we should all vote Labor, the same Labor Party which kept much of WorkChoices when it won the 2007 election and who are under the same pressure from the bosses to attack wages, conditions and jobs as the Liberals.  Instead of such an anodyne union response perhaps we should be talking about striking against WorkChoices part two.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Advertisement

Comments

Pingback from WorkChoices – it’s back – Written by JOHN PASSANT | winstonclose
Time August 5, 2015 at 5:15 am

[…] Posted by John, August 4th, 2015 – under Abbott government, Enterprise contracts, minimum wages, Penalty rates, WorkChoices, WorkChoices Lite. Comments: none […]

Comment from Mike
Time August 5, 2015 at 8:51 am

If weekends are so important, then people shouldn’t be paid more, shops should be forced to close.

Get rid of Sunday trading, and only allow Saturday trading until midday.

These workers will be better off by having more weekend time.

Comment from John
Time August 6, 2015 at 5:05 pm

Maybe because of the crap wages in the hospitality sector for example they rely on the penalty rates to survive.